Roundup Weedkiller Linked To Global Epidemic of Fatal Kidney Disease

Roundup Weedkiller Linked To Global Epidemic of Fatal Kidney Disease

Photo credit: Ed Kashi for La Isla Foundation/VII

The mystery of what is causing thousands to die each year from a fatal kidney disease may now be solved, with evidence pointing to the world’s most heavily used herbicide Roundup (glyphosate) as the primary culprit.

A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health proposes a link between the herbicide known as Roundup (aka glyphosate) and a series of mysterious epidemics of fatal chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu) affecting several poor farming regions around the world.

The extent of the health problem is so massive that the Center for Public Integrity found that CKDu has killed more people in El Salvador and Nicaragua than diabetes, AIDS and leukemia combined, over the past 5 years on record.

Titled, “Glyphosate, Hard Water and Nephrotoxic Metals: Are They the Culprits Behind the Epidemic of Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in Sri Lanka?,” researchers hypothesized that while glyphosate is toxic, it alone is not capable of destroying kidney tissue on the scale recently observed in rice paddy regions of Northern Sri Lanka, or in El Salvador where it is the second leading cause of death among men. They propose glyphosate becomes extremely toxic to the kidney when it mixes with ‘hard’ water or heavy metals like arsenic and cadmium, either naturally present in the soil or added externally through fertilizer inputs. Hard water contains ‘metals,’ such as calcium, magnesium, strontium and iron, along with carbonate, bicarbonate, sulphate and chlorides.

The new hypothesis explains a number of observations connected with the disease, including why in afflicted regions like Sri Lanka there has been a strong association between the consumption of hard water and the occurrence of this special kidney disease, with 96% of CKDu patients having consumed hard or very hard water for at least five years.

The image below shows how closely water hardness and the prevalence of CKDu overlap:

The discovery of a ‘new disease’

According to the study, a “Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown etiology (CKDu)” was discovered among the rice paddy farms in Northern Central Province of Sri Lanka in the mid-1990s.  The condition spread quickly to other farming areas, and now afflicts 15% of working age people in the northern part of the country, or a total population of 400,000 patients with an estimated death toll of around 20,000. Watch the videos “Mystery in the Fields” and “Cycle of Death” for 5 minute documentaries providing additional background information on afflicted areas around the world.

CKDu does not carry the same known risk factors as chronic kidney disease, which include diabetes, high blood pressure and glomerular nephritis, an inflammatory kidney condition. The Sri Lankan Ministry of Health introduced criteria for CKDu in 2009, including:

  1. No past history of, or current treatment for diabetes mellitus or chronic and/or severe hypertension, snake bites, urological disease of known etiology or glomerulonephritis.
  2. Normal glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1C ˂ 6.5%).
  3. Blood pressure ˂160/100 mmHg untreated or ˂140/90 mmHg on up to two 
antihypertensive agents.

Owing to the fact that geographical and socioeconomical factors play such a central role in determining risk, it has been assumed that environmental and occupational factors are the main causative agents and therefore that CKDu is a form of toxic nephropathy, i.e. chemically-induced damage. The authors point out that even the World Health Organization conducted studies to determine  the origin of CKDu, and that the general consensus is the disease as multiple causes, including:

  • Exposure to arsenic
  • Exposure to cadmium
  • Exposure to pesticides
  • Consumption of hard water
  • Low water intake
  • Exposure to high temperatures (and resultant dehydration)

The authors, however, propose: “Whatever hypothesis that is propounded should be able to answer the questions as to why CKDu is confined to certain geographical areas of Sri Lanka and why there was no CKDu in Sri Lanka prior to the 1990s.”

Roundup Weedkiller (Glyphosate) The Likely Culprit

The study goes on to detail how since 1977 political changes in Sri Lanka lead to large scale importation and application of agrochemicals, especially for rice paddy farming. They propose that 12-15 years of cumulative exposure to low concentration kidney-damaging compounds, along with their increasing bioaccumulation within the environment and human body, could explain the sudden appearance in the 1990’s of clinically identifiable CKDu.  They hypothesized the existence of a so-called Compound “X” as the incriminating agent, which they determined would have to have the following characteristics:

  • A compound made of recently (2–3 decades) introduced chemicals to the CKDu endemic area.
  • Ability to form stable complexes with hard water.
  • Ability to capture and retain arsenic and nephrotoxic metals and act as a “carrier” 
in delivering these toxins to the kidney.
  • Possible multiple routes of exposure: ingestion, dermal and respiratory absorption.
  • Not having a significant first pass effect when complexed with hard water.
  • Presenting difficulties in identification when using conventional analytical methods.

Following an extensive search they arrived at glyphosate, which is the most widely used herbicide in Sri Lanka, as the likely culprit. They describe how glyphosate’s half-life can increase from several weeks in normal water to many years in hard water, as it forms hard to biodegrade glyphosate-metal complexes (GMCs).  GMC exposure can happen in two ways: consumption of contaminated hard water, or it can form within the human body following glyphosate’s entry into circulation. Farmers (and their families) are at constant risk of exposure through skin or inhalation, in addition to untreated drinking water.

The study describes in depth the way in which GMCs may evade the liver’s detoxification mechanisms and damage the kidneys. This is in addition to the over 20 distinct modes of toxicity we have indexed on the GreenMedInfo.com database on glyphosate harms.

Finally, the authors discuss evidence that glyphosate may be behind similar epidemics of chronic kidney disease of unknown cause in Central American countries of El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, and India.

To read the entire open access study visit this link: www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/2/2125

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/roundup-weedkiller-linked-global-epidemic-fatal-kidney-disease

Posted in CKDu, Farming, Glyphosate, Mortality, RoundUp | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

One Apple a Day… BUT: Pesticide-Free + With Peel

apples-pixabay

Fresh, crunchy apples

It is October and apples abound everywhere.

They are crispy and tangy, lovely stuff, particularly when fresh (like now) and from your own (or a friend’s) garden and when free from pesticides.

Need some more reasons to consume apples?

  • Apples reduce cancer risk

An Italian study with over 7600 participants, eating one or more apples every day was associated with a reduced cancer risk compared with eating less than one apple a day. The biggest reductions were seen in cancers of the mouth and throat, larynx, colon/rectum and oesophagus (Ann Oncol, 2005; 16: 1841-4).

  • Apples might protect against cancer

In one Hawaiian study, there was a 40-50% lower lung-cancer risk in participants with the highest intakes of apples, onions and white grapefruit compared with those who consumed the lowest amounts of these foods. The decreased risk in lung cancer was seen in both men and women and in almost all ethnic groups (J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000; 92: 154-60).

University of Wisconsin research found that apple peel (high in antioxidants, known to have anticancer effects) can slow the growth of prostate and breast cancer cells.

Green tea is also helpful. Both green tea and apples are rich in polyphenols, compounds that have a protective effect which blocks a signalling molecule called VEGF. This molecule is the main driver of angiogenesis (blood vessel formation responsible for cancer growth), as well as the build-up of plaque in artery walls, which has been seen as the cause of heart attacks and strokes. This process is not a theory: it was actually observed by researchers from the Norwich BioScience Institute in blood samples. The polyphenols also activate another enzyme that helps promote nitric oxide in the blood, which helps widen blood vessels and prevents arterial damage.

  • Apples promote cardiovascular health

Research at Florida State University randomly assigned 160 postmenopausal women to one of two groups: one ate 75 g of dried apple per day (equivalent to two medium-sized apples); the other ate the same amount of dried plums (prunes).After six months, the dried-apple group had:

  • Eating apples might prevent strokes. A decade-long study in The Netherlands discovered that eating white fruits and vegetables, such as apples, pears and cauliflower, basically halved the risk of stroke. On the other hand, green, orange/yellow and red/purple fruits and vegetables were not linked to stroke incidence, the researchers found (Stroke, 2011; 42: 3190-5).
  • Apples effect on heart health may be partly due to quercetin, a potent antioxidant present in apples, onions, berries, red wine and other foods and drinks (but apples are a better souce). Research has shown that as quercetin intake increases, the risk of heart disease decreases (Adv Nutr, 2012; 3: 39-46).
  • 24% reduction in LDL, or ‘bad’, cholesterol levels compared with levels when they started the trial (J Acad Nutr Diet, 2012; 112: 1158-68).
  • a) significantly lower total cholesterol levels than in the prune group
  • b) better cardiovascular results might be obtained adding green tea to apple consumption
  • Apples can help reduce weight

Eating an apple before a meal could help you lose weight, according to some evidence. Researchers at Pennsylvania State University discovered that people who ate an apple 15 minutes before lunch consumed 15% fewer calories than those who ate nothing beforehand and ate less than those who had apple juice or apple sauce.Feeling of fullness: there is something about the whole solid fruit, not just the fibre, that is important for the satiating effect (Appetite, 2009; 52: 416-22). So, eat your apples whole for full benefits.

  • Apples can help reduce blood sugar and diabetes risk

In another study, 411 overweight women with high cholesterol were told to eat either an apple, pear or oat cookie three times a day for 12 weeks. Results: the participants who ate fruit (apples or pears) had significant weight loss (1.22 kg) after 12 weeks, whereas those eating the oat cookies saw no significant weight loss. Fruit eaters also had significantly lower blood glucose levels compared with the cookie eaters (Nutrition, 2003; 19: 253-6).

In a study about flavonoid intake, apples were the only flavonoid-rich food associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. Women eating one or more apples a day had a 28% lower risk of having type 2 diabetes compared with those who ate no apples. The results could be due to antioxidant compounds in apples such as catechins (also found in green tea), beta-carotene and vitamin C  (J Am Coll Nutr, 2005; 24: 376-84).

A 2015 study involving 200,000 men and women also found that apples reduced diabetes risk, although it concluded that blueberries and pears also had similar protective effects (Am J Clin Nutr, 2012; 95: 925-33).

  • Apples reduce asthma risk

Utrecht University (NL) published a study of over 1,200 children and their mothers showing that women who eat apples during pregnancy might be able to protect their children against developing asthma.Results showed that apples were the only food (among fruit, vegetables, fruit juice, wholegrain productgs, fish, dairy products and fat spreads) that was beneficially associated with asthma. The mums who ate the most apples during pregnancy were significantly less likely to have a child with asthma or wheeze than those who ate the least apples (Thorax, 2007; 62: 773-9).

Another study (this time of 1601 young adults in Australia) reported that apple and pear intakes were associated with a decreased risk of asthma and a reduction in hypersensitivity of the lungs (‘bronchial hyperreactivity’). On the other hand, total fruit and vegetable intake was not associated with asthma risk or severity, so this protection seems to be apple and pear specific (Am J Clin Nutr, 2003; 78: 414-21).

  • Apples for Alzheimer’s, Osteoporosis and Gastro-Intestinal Problems

A 2011 comprehensive review of studies on the health effects of the humble apple concluded that apples may even help to guard against developing Alzheimer’s disease, osteoporosis and gastro-intestinal problems (Adv Nutr, 2011; 2: 408-20).

TAKEAWAY MESSAGE:

Eat your daily apple (at least one). Your health will benefit.

WHAT TYPE of APPLES?

  1. A type you will consume.

2. A type that is high in phenolic compounds

Cornell University (Ithaca, NY) researchers concluded that the antioxidant activity of apples differed from one variety to another and was positively associated with the level of phenolics – in other words, the apple varieties with the higher levels of phenolics tended to have greater antioxidant activity (Nutr J, 2004; 3: 5).

Of the 10 most commonly consumed varieties in the US, Fuji apples had the highest total phenolic and flavonoid compounds, followed closely by Red Delicious, Northern Spy and Gala, whereas Cortland and Empire apples were among the varieties with the lowest amounts of phenolics and flavonoids.

3. Avoid pesticides

Please note that non-organic red delicious are often the most loaded with pesticides! And in general, 80% of apples have pesticides residues on them, so apples from your own (or your neighbour’s!) garden, apples from sources you trust or buy organic.

RESOURCES

https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/news/20000621/benefits-of-eating-fruit#1

https://www.webmd.com/heart/news/20110412/apple-good-for-your-heart#1

https://blogs.webmd.com/food-and-nutrition/2016/10/5-reasons-apples-are-a-perfect-pick.html

https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/news/20110613/apples-top-12-foods-with-most-pesticides#1

https://www.wddty.com/magazine/2012/september/an-apple-a-day.html

https://www.wddty.com/lifestyle/2017/07/the-health-benefits-of-eating-apples.html

https://www.wddty.com/news/2015/04/why-apples-and-green-tea-prevent-cancer-and-heart-disease.html

Molecular Nutrition and Food Research, 2015; 59(3): 401

https://www.naturalnews.com/047435_organic_apples_weight_loss_prebiotics.html

https://www.naturalnews.com/037747_apples_disease_prevention_health_benefits.html

https://www.naturalnews.com/040361_organic_apples_cancer_prevention_healthy_diet.html

https://www.naturalnews.com/053654_apples_longevity_flavonoids.html

 

 

Posted in Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, Dementia, Diabetes, Health, Lung Cancer, Osteoporosis, Stroke, Uncategorized, Weight-Loss | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Caffeine – is it good for us?

coffee-pixabay

Caffeine and Insulin

* Caffeine affects insulin sensitivity, which may protect you from developing Type 2 diabetes,

* However, if you already have diabetes, caffeine can cause a rise in blood glucose

Caffeine in Non-Diabetics
A 2011 cross-sectional study published in “Diabetalogia” investigated the effects of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee on insulin sensitivity in a group of non-diabetics. The study showed a positive relationship between caffeine and insulin sensitivity.

Caffeine on Type 2 Diabetic Men
A 2004 study published in the “Journal of Nutrition” tested the effects of caffeine on insulin sensitivity and blood sugar in a group of men with Type 2 diabetes. This study found that, while caffeine increased blood insulin levels, it did not improve blood sugars. In fact, blood sugars were elevated following the ingestion of caffeine.

Tags: caffeine, diabetes, insulin

Posted in Caffeine, Diabetes | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Aluminium + Glyphosate (Roundup)? Anxiety, depression, autism, coeliac disease

glyphosate-spraying-pixabay

How aluminum and glyphosate (Roundup) collaborate to cause anxiety, depression, autism and celiac disease

Dr. Stephanie Seneff,
Senior Research Scientist,
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
MIT

Dr. Stephanie Seneff – Toxic effects of glyphosate – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ovw3amJ0GU

– Glyphosate (Roundup) is sprayed on wheat even right before the harvest. This (at least partly) explains the epidemic in gluten intolerance, particularly in the US

– Glyphosate disrupts gut bacteria causing a deficiency in beneficial bacteria and an overgrowth of pathogenic forms

– Glyphosate depletes minerals like cobalt, zinc, molybdenum, and manganese by caging them; and thus it depletes serotonin and GABA levels, leading to symptoms of anxiety and depression

– Glyphosate disrupts cytochrome P450 enzymes in the gut and liver, with devastating health consequences

Two key problems in autism (unrelated to the brain yet clearly associated with the condition) are both linked with glyphosate exposure:

  • gut dysbiosis, and
  • disrupted sulfur metabolism/impaired sulfate transport
Glyphosate & Autism - Mercola.com

Glyphosate & Autism – Mercola.com

 

References:

https://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/06/09/monsanto-roundup-herbicide.aspx

 

Tags: anxiety, depression, autism, coeliac, glyphosate, Roundup

Posted in Aluminium, Anxiety, Autism, Coeliac Disease, Depression, Glyphosate, RoundUp | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HPV vaccine – Good News?

SacrificialVirgins_part1

Don’t we need protection against the HPV virus?

The HPV virus has NOT yet been proven to cause cervical cancer

  • Only “remnants” (“fossils”) of the HPV virus have been found in women with cervical cancer. This is at most an association, and does not prove causation.
  • Some scientists point out that humanity has successfully dealt with genital warts for thousands of years simply thanks to the immune system.

The HPV vaccine has not been proven to reduce cervical cancer incidence

The HPV vaccine has already given rise to extremely serious side effects (including deaths and paralysis) worldwide

  • So much so that some countries (like Japan) have halted their vaccination programme

In short:

why are the “powers that be” forcing this dangerous vaccine on unsuspecting young women when its need has NOT been clearly established and when the safety of this vaccine is so strongly in doubt, given the high rate of very serious side effects?

Are we sacrificing young maidens for “the greater good”? Find out more here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAzcMHaBvLs&feature=youtu.be

Also check out:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-19-evidence-hpv-vaccines-gardasil-severe-injuries-death.html

Posted in HPV, Vaccines, Women | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Arthritis Due to Aging or “Wear and Tear”? Think Again!

hands-545394_640

Ever been to the doctor with some kind of joint pain just to be told that it is “just wear and tear” (*shrug*)? I would probably be a millionaire if I had a tenner for each person that told me a story along these lines.

And yet, arthritis (particularly of the knee) is not just something that happens when we get older. Instead, new research suggests it is a preventable disease.

Arthritis has little to do with ageing or even ‘wear and tear’—instead, it is more likely to be caused by environmental factors, such as air pollution.

While cases of arthritis have doubled in the past hundred years, this epidemic is NOT due to us living longer or being heavier, which are just untested assumptions. (Read on…)

Researchers from Harvard University inspected the skeletons of 1,581 people from the 19th century who were aged 50 or over. They then compared them to those of 819 similar people who lived in the 20th century. After taking into account age and body mass index (BMI, a standard measure of obesity / overweight), it turned out that cases of knee arthritis had doubled in the later group, meaning neither age nor body weight are associated with the increase, and that this increase has to do with something else instead.

Big differences between the two centuries include the rise of industry and pollution, two world wars but also progressively more sedentary jobs and a change in agricultural and dietary practices which may well have had more of an impact on the disease than aging or weight increase.

It is also interesting to know:

  • Numerous studies have failed to find a direct relationship between pain and age.
  • Many chronic pain disorders occur less frequently with advancing age according to population studies.
  • Migraine pain, as well as low back, neck, and facial pain, is less common among older adults that it is among their younger counterparts.
  • Pain does not always progress. In a large cohort of patients with peripheral joint osteoarthritis, radiographic joint space narrowing worsened over 3 years, but this did not correlate consistently with worsening pain
  • The degree of pain experienced is more strongly associated with depression in older patients compared with younger adults. This may indicate another alternative explanation for factors involved in the arthritis epidemic.

How to avoid arthritis?

  • Eat well, mainly plant foods and ideally organic
  • Avoid / cut down on sugar and processed foods (particularly omega 6 fatty acids).
  • Avoid pesticide and chemical exposure in the air, food/water and on your skin
  • Exercise (particularly in a group, check out our Leicester classes!)
  • Practice gratitude – stay positive
  • Maintain a good social network

Emanuela
Holistic Fitness Consultant
www.pilatesfitness.co.uk


References

(Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017; 10.1073/pnas.1703856114)

https://wddty.com/news/2017/08/arthritis-has-nothing-to-do-with-old-age-or-wear-and-tear.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4356472/

Posted in Arthritis, Older Adult, Weight-Gain | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Why is staying active this summer vitally important?

activesummer-pixabay

By guest editor: Keisha Coggins

Keeping the body moving is vital through all seasons, however summer tends to be the time where we relax the most. Despite knowing the benefits of rest during this period, to keep off the aches and pains is best done while we are active through these summer months.

Here are a few insights of the effects of inactivity versus activity.

INACTIVE

  • Inactivity amongst individuals is the leading cause of deaths in developed countries. (WHO, 2002)
  • One study analyzed the global effect of inactivity on the increase of diseases. The researchers estimated that physical inactivity accounts for 6% of the burden of heart disease, 7% of type 2 diabetes, 10% of breast cancer, and 10% of colon cancer. Inactivity also causes 9% of premature mortality. These staggering statistics put the true dangers associated with inactivity into a global perspective. 
  • Studies have found that people who spend more time each day watching television, sitting, or riding in cars have a greater chance of dying early than people who are more active.

ACTIVE

  • Getting regular physical activity is one of the best things you can do for your health. It lowers the risk of heart disease, diabetes, stroke, high blood pressure, osteoporosis, and certain cancers, and it can also help control stress, improve sleep, boost mood, keep weight in check, and reduce the risk of falling and improve cognitive function in older adults.
  • Regular physical activity helps the body function better – it keeps heart disease, diabetes, and a host of other diseases at bay, and is a key component for losing weight.
  • Research has found that physical exercise has been valuable in the prevention of cognitive impairment, dementia in old age and has shown a “positive impact on brain metabolism… and general mood and sleep” (Mantura et al 2017)

Summer is a great time to utilise the weather and any outdoor sports or classes that will be running. Keeping active will be one of the best decisions you can make this summer.

Keisha   Keisha_LetsDoLeicester_250w

Emanuela’s comment:

Thank you, Keisha!

Cartwheels at the beach are great for some!  If are nowhere near a beach (or don’t want to risk a cartwheel), walking outdoors, especially in green areas, and playing in the park (or garden, if you have one), are great options to stay active and promote health this summer.

Involve the whole family! Make it a game…

For more structured exercise options, remember that we are keeping our classes going over the summer: Pilates and yoga are running throughout the summer and tai chi and vitality circuits are also available most of the summer!

http://www.pilatesfitness.co.uk/classes

Emanuela
Holistic Fitness Consultant
www.pilatesfitness.co.uk

Sources

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/staying-active/

Dunstan, D.W., et al., Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation, 2010. 121(3): p. 384-91.

Matura, S. et al (2017) ‘Effects of aerobic exercise on brain metabolism and grey matter volume in older adults: results of the randomised controlled SMART trial,’ in Translational Psychiatry, 2017; 7 (7): e1172 DOI:10.1038/tp.2017.135

Patel, A.V., et al., Leisure time spent sitting in relation to total mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol, 2010. 172(4): p. 419-29.


van der Ploeg, H.P., Chey, T., Ding, D., Chau, J.Y., Stamatakis, E., Bauman, A.E. Standing time and all-cause mortality in a large cohort of Australian adults. Prev Med, 2014. 69C:187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.004.

World Health Organisation, (2002), Reducing Risks and Promoting Healthy Life, Online: 31st July 2017 Access at http://www.who.int/whr/2002/en/

Posted in Exercise, Health | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Merck Admits… Shingles Vaccine Can Cause Eye Damage AND Shingles

syringe-vaccine-pixabay-smallsize

Merck Pharmaceutical’s shingles vaccine “Zostavax” was introduced in 2006

It was soon recognised that the vaccine could cause chickenpox. A study showed that, within ten minutes of being vaccinated with the shingles vaccine, Zostavax, 50% of those who had taken part in the study had skin samples testing positive for Zostavax VZV DNA, and could potentially infect unvaccinated individuals with chicken pox. So much for unvaccinated individuals putting others at risk! [1]

In August 2014, another side effect was added: shingles! You could not make this up. The vaccine that has always been aggressively marketed to prevent seniors from contracting this excruciating condition was found to actually cause shingles in some individuals. [2]

In February 2016, the FDA approved the addition to the label warning of another potential Zostavax vaccine side effect: “Eye Disorders: necrotizing retinitis”. [2]

Necrotizing retinitis and keratitis cause inflammation and scarring of the eye tissue and can lead to permanent vision loss, unless treated quickly. WebMD reports that:

  • 20 individuals (children and adults) developed keratitis within a month of receiving a chickenpox or shingles vaccine.
  • Keratitis symptoms for adults developed within 24 days of vaccination, while
  • symptoms in children began within 14 days of vaccination.

“Researchers concluded there is a probable relationship between the vaccine and the eye inflammation”. Worryingly, researchers do not know why the shingles shot may cause keratitis, though the condition has been linked to autoimmune disorders. 

The connection between vaccines and autoimmune disease has been widely acknowledged, most recently by medical researchers worldwide in a compilation of studies published in 2015 in the medical textbook, Vaccines & Autoimmunity

“UCLA researchers found that only one in 175 people who get the vaccine will be able to dodge a shingles flare-up”[2]. 

  • Merck claims Zostavax is 50% effective: in the placebo group, 3.3 percent of the study participants developed shingles, compared to 1.6 percent in the vaccine group. These are quite low incidences. So, while that is a 50% difference,
  • the real, absolute risk reduction is just 1.7 percentage points. That is peanuts!

Side Effects

According to its current warning label, Zostovax’s most common side effects are “headache, redness, pain, itching, swelling, hard lump, warmth, or bruising where the shot was given.”  However, more serious “side effects” include:

  • allergic reactions, which may be serious and may include difficulty in breathing or swallowing
  • chickenpox
  • fever
  • hives at the injection site
  • joint pain
  • muscle pain
  • nausea
  • rash
  • rash at the injection site
  • shingles
  • swollen glands near the injection site (that may last a few days to a few weeks)

And these are only the recognised ones!

In the meantime, pharmaceutical companies get paid $150-$300 a shot for this seriously questionable shingles vaccine that can give you shingles!

[1] http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researcher-blog/scientists-prove-those-vaccinated-for-shingles-can-infect-others-with-chicken-pox

[2] http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researcher-blog/merck-admits-shingles-vaccine-can-cause-eye-damage-and-shingles

 

Posted in Eye Disorders, Older Adult, Shingles, Vaccines | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Surgery – the Answer to Your Back Problems?

back-pain-red-circle

Fed up with back pain? Surgery seems such a convenient answer to our prayers. But is it?

Could surgery be the solution to your back pain worries, particularly that pesky lower back pain?

[There are probably some acute cases where surgery is likely warranted, particularly neck and upper back fractures due to impact/systemic infections where motor and/or sensory nerves are being severely compromised with significant loss of strength and/or proprioception. I am not addressing these specific cases here]

Frankly, in general, it is unlikely to be much help.

1. People given epidural anaesthesia for any reason (including back pain) complained of back pain afterwards

Epidural anaesthesia for pain relief during childbirth and for outpatient ‘awake’ surgery has been found to cause a high incidence of long-term back pain. It seems the cause is bad posture for some time during and after surgery, often without realising.

On the other hand, in a study of 9000 patients given epidurals for surgery other than childbirth, one in 50 complained of backache afterward.

Hysterectomy surgery in particular has been implicated in back pain (and other nasty complications) in women

2. Back Surgery Has a POOR TRACK RECORD for “Fixing” Back Pain or Even Just for “Postoperative Happiness”

What if you ALREADY have back pain, have had it for a while and are frankly “fed up” with it? Surely it could not get any worse anyway? Well…

Professor Gordon Waddell, a renowned Scottish orthopaedic and author of The Back Pain Revolution (Churchill Livingston, 1999), doesn’t like to mince words. “Back surgery,” he once remarked, “has been accused of leaving more tragic human wreckage in its wake than any other operation in history.”

The latest evidence shows that the figures have hardly improved.

For back patients who undergo surgery:

  • 15-20% will fall into the category of ‘the failed back’, the official term for people with chronic, considerable back pain that doctors cannot fix.
  • Considering that half a million patients go under the knife in the US every year, that means that up to 100,000 people a year emerge from back surgery every year in considerably more pain than they were before they went to their doctor – and this is in the US only!

Back-pain treatments has traditionally followed fashionable ideas relating to theories about the cause of the pain… sacroiliac joint, joint facets and so on.

The most popular operations currently include:

  • laminectomy, where nearby bone and/or ligaments are removed to give the nerve branching off the central spinal cord more space to move without getting trapped by the spine
  • discectomy, removing all or part of a bulging or ‘slipped’ disc, the cushion separating each vertebra from another, that presses spinal nerve, causing back pain
  • disc replacement, where the disc is replaced by an artificial implant made of metal and plastic
  • fusion, where a degenerated disc is removed and the vertebrae above and below it are joined together, leaving that segment of the spine locked in position

Recent major reviews of all the evidence for the various kinds of surgery for back pain show that, like their predecessors, all these latest operations offer minimal advantages over doing nothing or undergoing rehabilitation.

How well does fusion work?

Actually, fusion usually makes things worse

In a 2010 study, researchers studied the records for 1,450 patients in the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation database who had diagnoses of disc degeneration, disc herniation or radiculopathy, where a nerve is pinched or irritated, causing tingling and weakness of the limbs.

Two years after surgery:

  • only 26% of those who had had surgery had returned to work, whereas
  • 67% of patients who did not have surgery had returned to work

Of the patients who had had fusion surgery:

  • 36% had complications
  • 27% required another operation
  • 11% were permanently disabled (compared with only 2 per cent of patients not having surgery)
  • 17 had died (compared with 11 of the controls).

After surgery, there was a 41% increase in the use of painkillers like morphine, while around 75% of patients continue taking opiates after surgery.

Lumbar fusion . . . is associated with significant increase in disability,”  the researchers declared

Does Tiger Woods know, has he ever looked at these stats? He first had a microdiscectomy in 2014, then two other back surgeries and in April 2017 he had a fusion . This shows that even being a top level athlete and having lots of money to spend on securing “the best surgeons” are no guarantees that you can find an easy surgical solution to your back troubles!

By cause of pain:

  • When two independent reviewers surveyed all the available evidence on all major procedures, those patients with low back pain and common degenerative changes who’d undergone fusion fared no better than those who had intensive rehabilitation, with less than half having optimal outcomes
  • Disc problems and spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spaces in the spine, causing pressure on the spinal cord and nerves): patients on average experience improvement either with or without surgery. A study comparing fusion with intensive rehabilitation concluded that surgery only provides “short-term benefits” which “diminish with long-term follow-up
  • Surgery for slipped disc. The jury is out (See for details)
  • Disc replacement.

A Cochrane review of seven studies comparing fusion with disc replacement in a total of 1,474 patients, those getting their discs replaced had slightly better outcomes than those being fused, but the differences were NOT significant. The researchers cautioned, “because we believe that harm and complications may occur after years, we believe that the spine surgery community should be prudent about adopting this technology on a large scale”

  • Laminectomy – no good evidence

While surgeons have a whole palette of laminectomy techniques, when a group of Cochrane researchers compared three new surgical techniques with the ‘gold-standard’ laminectomy, they found no differences between any of them, plus such poor study designs that they could not determine surgical outcomes in many instances.

A recent Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials found that surgery had little benefit but also had serious side effects in 10-24% of cases. These side effects included:

  • spinal fractures
  • coronary ischaemia (narrowed heart blood vessels)
  • respiratory distress
  • blood clots
  • stroke
  • death due to fluid accumulation in the lungs

Non-surgical (conservative) management of back pain

  • A recent Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials compared surgery for spinal stenosis with non-surgical management. Although the studies were high quality, the researchers could find little benefit with surgery and, instead, found evidence of serious side-effects in 10–24% of surgery cases compared with none when patients were managed conservatively (no surgery).
  • I remember reading a couple of years back in an article that Tiger Woods (now caught up in a series of expensive back surgeries) wished he had never had that first back surgery.
  • Surgical back solutions should at best be seen as “the last resort”. Most people can do much more than they think via conservative approaches that will require them to work for it, but will be much better for their bodies in the short, mid and long term.
  • Conservative management (“reduction”) of back pain beats the alternative in my opinion. More on this in another article. Stay tuned!

Emanuela – www.pilatesfitness.co.uk

Leicester Pilates Fitness Logo

 

References

https://wddty.com/magazine/1993/december/back-pain-the-dangers-of-surgery-2.html

https://www.wddty.com/magazine/2015/december/hysterectomys-dirty-little-secret-back-pain.html

https://www.wddty.com/magazine/2016/may/so-you-think-you-need-back-surgery.html

http://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-tiger-woods-back-surgery-20170420-story.html

Posted in Back Pain, Surgery | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Could Fizzy Water Be Making You Fat?

glass-of-water-side-pixabay

The Daily Telegraph recently reported that “Fizzy water could cause obesity by encouraging you to eat more”. The story comes from a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Obesity Research and Clinical Practice.

Previously, quite a few studies had highlighted a link between obesity and soft drinks, which is most likely to be related to:

  • their sugar content (and particularly high-fructose corn syrup) or even
  • (zero-calorie or low-calorie) sweeteners.

Now, it seems that perhaps the carbon dioxide they contain could also be at fault, that carbonation by itself could lead to weight gain. This would mean that even sparkling water would be leading to weight gain.

What is the research on this? Researchers from Birzeit University in Palestine ran two studies, one on rodents and one on humans. The findings for the rodent study were:

  • the rodents that drank carbonated (sparkling) water ate 20% more and gained more weight over 6 months than those that drank still (flat) water.
  • the rodents drinking carbonated water had higher levels of the hormone ghrelin (hunger hormone, higher levels of which encourage eating more)

The findings from the human study were:

  • in the human volunteers, ghrelin levels were higher after drinking fizzy drinks one hour after food – three-folds higher than after flat soda, and six-folds higher than after water.
  • probably more interesting stuff, to which I do not have access

Discussion

  • This indicate that carbonation and ghrelin production *just MIGHT* be an additional explanation for increased appetite and incidence of obesity. However…
  • Limitations:
    • I have to wonder… does the timing of the fizzy drink matter? Drinking in the morning or in a fasted state, or after only a LIGHT breakfast (as in the human study) may be different to drinking the sparkling water after a substantial meal or later in the day.
    • the study only included a small sample of just 20 male subjects, all aged 18-23 (hardly representative of human lifespan)
    • this is not enough participants to allow drawing any conclusions
    • it is impossible to extrapolate these findings to all males, any females, people in different age brackets or other populations with different genes and food environments.
  • Study Significance
    • These studies simply raise the possibility that carbonated drinks (also known as “fizzy drinks”)- even if unsweetened and containing no sweeteners whatsoever – could stimulate appetite and increase weight-gain risk
    • This hypothesis definitely warrants further investigation
    • It is possible that the effect noticed is due to a host of other reasons, such as that people who consume lots of fizzy drinks may also be more likely to have a less healthy diet and to be doing less exercise

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

What does it mean for us now? While science does it thing, we can certainly try going “fizzy-free” to see if that has any impact on our hunger levels or body weight…

REFERENCES

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/15/fizzy-water-could-cause-obesity-encouraging-eat/

Carbon dioxide in carbonated beverages induces ghrelin release and increased food consumption in male rats: Implications on the onset of obesity, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28228348

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/behindtheheadlines/news/2017-05-15-can-fizzy-water-make-you-fat-/

http://thehealthscienceacademy.org/science-catch-up/

Posted in Health, Weight-Gain | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment